Re: ls -l versus du -sk after xfs_fsr

[Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>]

Mathieu Betrancourt wrote:
> hi,
>
> I have the same problem on a xfs on a raid 1 device (mdraid), wich is almost
> full (97%)
> and not on other non raid devices (and unfortunately not almost full).
>
> This problem appeared under Fedora3 and Suse9.3
>
> Here's the output of xfs_info for the problematic one :

Thanks, good (I guess!) to know that it's reproducible... so far we have 
not been able to reproduce it in-house.

Mathieu, are you also using acls and/or extended attributes?

It would also be interesting to see the xfs_repair output, and xfs_bmap 
(-v and -a) output of the problematic files prior to running xfs_fsr, if 
possible.

Thanks,

-Eric