| To: | Ludek Finstrle <luf@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: ls -l versus du -sk after xfs_fsr |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 03 Oct 2005 13:12:55 -0500 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20051001091130.GA15808@soptik.pzkagis.cz> |
| References: | <20050926071451.GA3751@soptik.pzkagis.cz> <4338128F.8000707@sgi.com> <20050927163531.GA19652@soptik.pzkagis.cz> <433976C5.1000104@sgi.com> <20050929054410.GA30789@soptik.pzkagis.cz> <20051001091130.GA15808@soptik.pzkagis.cz> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) |
Ludek Finstrle wrote:
Do you happen to still have the xfs_repair output in scrollback somewhere? Could you also please send xfs_info output for the filesystem, to see the fs geometry? And just out of curiosity, what sort of storage is this on? Thanks, -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: grub disaster with FC4 & XFS, James Pearson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: ls -l versus du -sk after xfs_fsr, Mathieu Betrancourt |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: ls -l versus du -sk after xfs_fsr, Ludek Finstrle |
| Next by Thread: | Re: ls -l versus du -sk after xfs_fsr, Mathieu Betrancourt |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |