Re: ls -l versus du -sk after xfs_fsr

[Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>]

Ludek Finstrle wrote:
> > > I have problem with diferrence in filesize between ls -l and du -sk
> > > after xfs_fsr (it was ok before running xfs_fsr):
> > >
> > > # ls -l Drafts
> > > -rw-rw----  1  user  group  74646  Apr 15 17:37  Drafts
> > > # du -b Drafts
> > > 3221303296  Drafts
> > can you run xfs_bmap -v Drafts
>
> # xfs_bmap -v Drafts
> Drafts:
>  EXT: FILE-OFFSET      BLOCK-RANGE        AG AG-OFFSET        TOTAL FLAGS
>    0: [0..151]:        14693632..14693783  7 (13568..13719)     152 00101
151 * 512 = 77824, so that's fine... bmap reports only 78k used.  Not sure du 
is reporting more...
Well, if you run into this again we'll dig some more :)

Do you happen to still have the xfs_repair output in scrollback somewhere?

Thanks,

-Eric