Re: ls -l versus du -sk after xfs_fsr

[Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>]

Ludek Finstrle wrote:
> Hello,
>
>   I have problem with diferrence in filesize between ls -l and du -sk
> after xfs_fsr (it was ok before running xfs_fsr):
>
> # ls -l Drafts
> -rw-rw----  1  user  group  74646  Apr 15 17:37  Drafts
> # du -b Drafts
> 3221303296  Drafts
>
> Is there a way to correct it?
can you run xfs_bmap -v Drafts

I'm curious to see how this is laid out on disk....  whether it is really using 
3G of blocks...
If the file is otherwise readable (i.e. the first 74646 bytes are right) simply 
copying the file to a new name & back -might- solve the problem.  I haven't 
seen this particular problem before...
If you can keep the original problematic file around, though, it'd be 
interesting to figure out what's happened here.
-Eric

> My versions:
> kernel 2.4.31 vanilla + ACL patches
> xfsprogs-2.6.36-1
> acl-2.2.31-1
> attr-2.4.23-0
>
> Thanks
>
> Luf