| To: | Ruben <ruben@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS problem |
| From: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 19 Sep 2005 03:24:51 -0700 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <432E8DD5.9060809@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <432AA8FF.4080809@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050919094214.GB2660@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <432E8BD5.5090101@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050919100546.GA3384@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <432E8DD5.9060809@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 12:07:17PM +0200, Ruben wrote: > Could be this one? Yes, it might be (I've seen much worse). Run xfs_fsr over that and you'll see quiet a difference. If the file changes whilst xfs_fsr is running (as can happen with logs) then no reorganization will occur and you will have to retry (ideally with the logging stopped). |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS problem, Ruben |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS problem, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS problem, Ruben |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS problem, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |