[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS - hard drive dying

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, iusty@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: XFS - hard drive dying
From: A JM <vbtalent@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 07:59:05 -0400
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=sfV3YAXcRrHJ+lTlc/fRKEDGU/zCf9iuwgsLvxFUx51bal01XlJSMbhbnZyCmry0QIMTWRdsluDjM+LlhKS9PoJHRmZTMJVsUUk7AQBrf344xkEgzJ72PE0lhWVI6LkY+DxRBpO9YoAqlsblSlJIRNrf+2o97PLQkyVByb/ujoY=
In-reply-to: <20050904095639.GA8344@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <a0f05e8905090215183e30f40c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <a0f05e8905090303584075a22e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4319B8DD.7080200@xxxxxxx> <a0f05e8905090311012f7b018e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050903194320.GA6857@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <a0f05e890509031318277a5425@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050904095639.GA8344@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: vbtalent@xxxxxxxxx
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
The volume group I created was as far as I know a "default" setup...

If I'm going to try to re-create the VG, the /dev/hdb1 (dying 200gig Maxtor 
) will be dd' d to a 250gig drive, different size. Since I'm dd'ing the 
drive and it's creating a partition /dev/hdb1 on the new drive will that 
cause a problem? I'm guessing not, since it's essentially identical just 

Just thinking out loud here, since I'm trying to fix (xfs_repair) a VG and 
the essential data I'm looking for "should" still be intact on the new drive 
I just dd'd from the dying one. How will the newly created VG on dev/hda4 
know to incorporate the exisitng VG on the second drive /dev/hdb1? and will 
it matter if the VG on /dev/hda4 is not identical to the original as long as 
it knows to incorporate all of /dev/hdb1 into the VG and the VG name is the 
same therefore I can run xfs_repair on it. 

Don't you have to set the "blocks" or something when incorporating a new 
drive into the VG?

Thanks for all the help and ideas.

On 9/4/05, Iustin Pop <iusty@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 04:18:00PM -0400, A JM wrote:
> > Yes, I think you understood correctly. The LVM spanned 1 full disk (hdb 
> or
> > hdb1) and a partition on another disk (hda4).
> > I might have a "slight" problem re-activating the VG since the original 
> OS
> > has been rebuilt and therefore doesn't contain what I'm assuming from 
> your
> > post, the original VG data? This is not good!
> Uh oh... Could be a problem.
> > Can I re-create the VG on the rebuilt OS and try to incorporate hdb1 
> back
> > into the new VG? Then try running xfs_repair?
> Well, if both /dev/hda4 and /dev/hdb1 are available, you should be able
> to recreate it. As far as I know, in default configurations, metadata is
> written on all PVs.
> Try: vgscan and see if you see the VGforMyth volume. If not, try
> pvdisplay /dev/hda4 and pvdisplay /dev/hdb1. Post the output.
> Regards,
> Iustin Pop

[[HTML alternate version deleted]]

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>