[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Corruption of in-memory data detected.

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Corruption of in-memory data detected.
From: Jan Derfinak <ja@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 21:10:29 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: evilninja <evilninja@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <43220456.80304@sgi.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0509082156530.9425@alienAngel.home.sk> <4321CDDD.8010607@gmx.net> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0509092130160.8548@alienAngel.home.sk> <43220456.80304@sgi.com>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Eric Sandeen wrote:

> Jan Derfinak wrote:
> > Do you realy think that memory break on two different machines just after
> > switch to 2.6.13 kernel? But ok I will do it this night.
> You're right, these messages don't often indicate bad memory.  Worth ruling
> out though, I suppose, if you have the time.

Memory is OK. Overnight memtest ended without errors.



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>