xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Corruption of in-memory data detected.

To: evilninja <evilninja@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Corruption of in-memory data detected.
From: Jan Derfinak <ja@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 21:08:48 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4322F25E.7000704@gmx.net>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0509082156530.9425@alienAngel.home.sk> <4321CDDD.8010607@gmx.net> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0509092130160.8548@alienAngel.home.sk> <4322F25E.7000704@gmx.net>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005, evilninja wrote:

Hello.

> 
> out of curiosity: why are you running a SGI-CVS kernel anyway? what am i
> missing with a stock kernel?

kdb, some important fixes. I just downloaded vanilla 2.6.13 and it seems that
for example "TAKE 941429 - Retry linux inode cacech lookup if we found a
stale inode" is not there. It is simpler to use SGI CVS tree than patch
vanilla tree. And my long-term experience is that SGI tree is stable.

jan

-- 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>