| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Corruption of in-memory data detected. |
| From: | Jan Derfinak <ja@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 10 Sep 2005 21:10:29 +0200 (CEST) |
| Cc: | evilninja <evilninja@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <43220456.80304@sgi.com> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.58.0509082156530.9425@alienAngel.home.sk> <4321CDDD.8010607@gmx.net> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0509092130160.8548@alienAngel.home.sk> <43220456.80304@sgi.com> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Jan Derfinak wrote: > > Do you realy think that memory break on two different machines just after > > switch to 2.6.13 kernel? But ok I will do it this night. > > You're right, these messages don't often indicate bad memory. Worth ruling > out though, I suppose, if you have the time. Memory is OK. Overnight memtest ended without errors. jan -- |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Corruption of in-memory data detected., Jan Derfinak |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Corruption of in-memory data detected., Jan Derfinak |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Corruption of in-memory data detected., Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Corruption of in-memory data detected., evilninja |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |