| To: | Jan Derfinak <ja@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Corruption of in-memory data detected. |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 09 Sep 2005 16:53:26 -0500 |
| Cc: | evilninja <evilninja@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.58.0509092130160.8548@alienAngel.home.sk> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.58.0509082156530.9425@alienAngel.home.sk> <4321CDDD.8010607@gmx.net> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0509092130160.8548@alienAngel.home.sk> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) |
Jan Derfinak wrote:
Do you realy think that memory break on two different machines just after switch to 2.6.13 kernel? But ok I will do it this night. You're right, these messages don't often indicate bad memory. Worth ruling out though, I suppose, if you have the time. -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Corruption of in-memory data detected., Chris Croswhite |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Corruption of in-memory data detected., Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Corruption of in-memory data detected., Jan Derfinak |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Corruption of in-memory data detected., Jan Derfinak |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |