xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: how to defragment xfs?

To: Allan Haywood <allanh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: how to defragment xfs?
From: Ming Zhang <mingz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 19:43:26 -0400
Cc: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>, xfs <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <14BC3454F4B4614FBC4F3FB19A84C3720D466E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: no-dole-available
References: <14BC3454F4B4614FBC4F3FB19A84C3720D466E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: mingz@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
my problem is i do not have this command at all in my FC box. I will
compile one from source. thx

ming

On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 18:48 -0400, Allan Haywood wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 08:36 +1000, Nathan Scott wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 06:02:18PM -0400, Ming Zhang wrote:
> > > Thanks all!
> > > 
> > > My fault. I remember there is a command for xfs or reiserfs to do
> this
> > > and i can not figure out the name. then i check xfs_* on my box and
> none
> > > of them doing this job. so i assumed it is for reiserfs.
> > > 
> > > it is quite weired that my FC box does not have this command in
> > > xfsprogs.
> > 
> > Its in the "xfsdump" package, not "xfsprogs".
> > 
> > cheers.
> > 
> 
> [root@amd64 mingz]# yum install xfsdump
> Setting up Install Process
> Setting up Repos
> base                      100% |=========================| 1.1 kB
> 00:00
> updates-released          100% |=========================|  951 B
> 00:00
> Reading repository metadata in from local files
> base      : ################################################## 2852/2852
> primary.xml.gz            100% |=========================| 445 kB
> 00:20
> MD Read   : ################################################## 1117/1117
> updates-re: ################################################## 1117/1117
> No Match for argument: xfsdump
> Nothing to do
> 
> 
> i guess my FC3 X86_64 does not have it yet.
> 
> Ming
> 
> ------------------
> 
> Try running "xfs_fsr" without the quotes.
> 
> You don't have to unmount any file systems, or do anything special for
> it to run. Also the defaults should be fine for you. You can read the
> man page for more info on how it runs.
> 
> Also try running using -v, it outputs details of what it is doing which
> is kinda interesting.
> 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>