| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>, "Wilkins, Vern" <vwilkins@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: file system defragmentation |
| From: | "Bryan J. Smith" <b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 27 Aug 2005 20:41:08 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <43112C5D.8090202@xxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> wrote: > XFS uses delayed allocation, meaning that blocks for a > file are not immediately allocated - this allows the > allocator to allocate more blocks at a time, and do a more > efficient job of keeping blocks in a file unfragmented. XFS further uses extents to allocation different areas of the disk for small files away from larger files. This combined with delayed allocation means that larger files are not put near small files, and both types (especially small files) are fit much better. -- Bryan J. Smith | Sent from Yahoo Mail mailto:b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx | (please excuse any http://thebs413.blogspot.com/ | missing headers) |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: file system defragmentation, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Will we ever see XFS supported in Red Hat Enterprise Linux?, Joshua Baker-LePain |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: file system defragmentation, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: file system defragmentation, Russell Howe |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |