| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS and AMD64 |
| From: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 12 Aug 2005 09:46:10 +1000 |
| In-reply-to: | <20050811045004.GD2029@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx on Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 08:50:05PM -0800 |
| References: | <20050808025536.GA2029@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <p73irye3oyz.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050811045004.GD2029@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 08:50:05PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote: > > so is 32 bit userspace xfsutils kosher with a 64 bit xfs kernel? or > are there silly ioctl() issues? See debian bug 257265. Looks like silly ioctl issues were reported for sparc64 (64bit kernel, 32bit userspace) about a year ago and a fix was put into the 2.6.8-1 kernel package. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=257265 If the debian AMD64 kernel is not built from this package (or it's descendent) you'll need to check to see if this mod is in that kernel.` Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner R&D Software Enginner SGI Australian Software Group |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | XFS - hard drive dying, A JM |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS - hard drive dying, A JM |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS and AMD64, Ethan Benson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS and AMD64, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |