| To: | Al Boldi <a1426z@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: TAKE 934766 - Delay direct I/O completion to a workqueue |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 5 Aug 2005 10:08:20 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200508040532.IAA21511@raad.intranet> |
| References: | <200508031058.j73AwZFZ027123@naboo.americas.sgi.com> <200508040532.IAA21511@raad.intranet> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 05:31:58PM +0300, Al Boldi wrote: > Will this affect XFS behaviour with regards to the non-existent > Ordered-Mode? No. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | XFS and HP DataProtector - A possbile work-around, Collaros, John |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: TAKE 934766 - Delay direct I/O completion to a workqueue, Al Boldi |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: TAKE 934766 - Delay direct I/O completion to a workqueue, Al Boldi |
| Next by Thread: | RE: TAKE 934766 - Delay direct I/O completion to a workqueue, Al Boldi |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |