xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS, 4K stacks, and Red Hat

To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS, 4K stacks, and Red Hat
From: Alexander Bergolth <leo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 14:12:45 +0200
Cc: Joshua Baker-LePain <jlb17@xxxxxxxx>, Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>, Linux xfs mailing list <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20050713015626.GD980@frodo>
Newsgroups: wu.mail.sys.linux.xfs
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0507071102460.4766@chaos.egr.duke.edu> <42CD4D38.1090703@xfs.org> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0507071142550.4766@chaos.egr.duke.edu> <20050708043740.GB1679@frodo> <42D3F44B.308@strike.wu-wien.ac.at> <20050713015626.GD980@frodo>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6-1.1.fc3 (X11/20050720)
On 07/13/2005 03:56 AM, Nathan Scott wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 06:48:11PM +0200, Alexander Bergolth wrote:
>>On 07/08/2005 06:37 AM, Nathan Scott wrote:
>>>...
>>>As other cases pop up (with a reproducible test case please, and
>>>no stacking drivers in the way too :), we slowly iron them out..
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> *cough*
> 
>>I'm getting frequent stack overflows on one system, using xfs, lvm2,
>>sw-raid and libata but I don't know, if they are XFS-related.
> 
> Hmmm - xfs on lvm on md on ide ...?  Looks like its death by
> a thousand cuts.. thats the sort of case Steve keeps talking
> about.  You will be able to crash using any filesystem doing
> this, eventually - and we haven't even got NFS in the picture
> here yet.
> 
> ( Maybe you can do away with one of device mapper / MD here? )

I've switched to linuxant's 16k stack kernels for fedora and the machine
didn't crash any more. (Although an 8k stack would probably have been
enough.)

http://www.linuxant.com/driverloader/wlan/full/downloads-fc3-kernel-i686.php

Cheers,
--leo


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: XFS, 4K stacks, and Red Hat, Alexander Bergolth <=