| To: | Esben Nielsen <simlo@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: RT and XFS |
| From: | Bill Huey (hui) <bhuey@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 18 Jul 2005 20:26:24 -0700 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Daniel Walker <dwalker@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>, Dave Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, greg@xxxxxxxxx, Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>, Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.OSF.4.05.10507171848440.14250-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20050714160835.GA19229@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.OSF.4.05.10507171848440.14250-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.9i |
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 02:10:31PM +0200, Esben Nielsen wrote: > Unfortunately, one of the goals of the preempt-rt branch is to avoid > altering too much code. Therefore the type semaphore can't be removed > there. Therefore the name still lingers ... :-( This is where you failed. You assumed that that person making the comment, Christopher, in the first place didn't have his head up his ass in the first place and was open to your end of the discussion. bill |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | XFS links, Nick I |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RT and XFS, hui |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: RT and XFS, Richard B. Johnson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RT and XFS, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |