xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfsdump slow on large filesystem.

To: Greg Freemyer <greg.freemyer@xxxxxxxxx>, melamud@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: xfsdump slow on large filesystem.
From: Eugene Melamud <melamud@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 13:08:35 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <87f94c3705071811305dc8116d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: melamud@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
I see the confusion, I should have been more exact with units.

The units are in bytes not bits. So if my math is correct, 35 gigabytes 
in 16 hrs is 35,840 megabytes in 16*60*60 sec, that 
gives me 0.62 megabytes per sec.

Still too slow..


--- Greg Freemyer <greg.freemyer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 7/18/05, Eugene Melamud wrote:
> > Greetings,
> > 
> > I am getting really miserable results from xfsdump when mirroring large 
> > filesystem over
> network.
> > The command I run on the source computer is this.
> > 
> > xfsdump -A -J - /dev/sda1 | ssh node22 xfsrestore -J -A - /backup
> > 
> > Two computers are connected via 1Gbit network. Connection is good, when I 
> > test transfers with
> > rsync, I get transfer between two computers at 35Mb/sec easy on large 
> > files. The maximum read
> > speed on /dev/sda1 measured with dd is about 45 Mb/sec. The maximum write 
> > speed on /backup
> raid
> > disk is about 100Mb/sec.
> > 
> > Given that the most file on the filesystem are small, I can not expect very 
> > high throughput. I
> was
> > hopping for at least 10Mb/sec. What I get is 35G transferred in the last 
> > 16hrs, that's less
> than
> > 1Mb/sec.
> > 
> 
> Still not fast, but by my math 35GB in 16 hours is 5.3 Mb/sec.  (Were
> you calculating MB/sec. ?)
> 
> Or were all of the above Mb/sec. figures meant to be MB/Sec.  They do
> all seem too small for Mb/Sec. values.
> 
> Greg
> -- 
> Greg Freemyer
> The Norcross Group
> Forensics for the 21st Century
> 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>