xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS corruption on move from xscale to i686

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS corruption on move from xscale to i686
From: Yura Pakhuchiy <pakhuchiy@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 17:45:15 +0300
Cc: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tibor@xxxxxxxxxxx
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=r3FzwxfGcaZ8dL6qbrzI1AtldyXEdZeiUCmBywzeXqOD/ZHG61Gn7rSe8hq2h4dfnydpRrekMbPAZ1VFDZ7p+mo7rcyKAeVxhsiXUIQIDmSqAwRqtK1eJkolZpzzRZg+ondvjm595vnv+7PO64Q/vFC1fHy2tc1TbnBqTduXNXg=
In-reply-to: <20050714143830.GA17842@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1120756552.5298.10.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050708042146.GA1679@frodo> <60868aed0507130822c2e9e97@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050714012048.GB937@frodo> <60868aed050714065047e3aaec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050714143830.GA17842@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Yura Pakhuchiy <pakhuchiy@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
2005/7/14, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 04:50:01PM +0300, Yura Pakhuchiy wrote:
> > 2005/7/14, Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>:
> > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 06:22:28PM +0300, Yura Pakhuchiy wrote:
> > > > I found patch by Greg Ungreger to fix this problem, but why it's still
> > > > not in mainline? Or it's a gcc problem and should be fixed by gcc folks?
> > >
> > > Yes, IIRC the patch was incorrect for other platforms, and it sure
> > > looked like an arm-specific gcc problem (this was ages back, so
> > > perhaps its fixed by now).
> >
> > AFAIR gcc-3.4.3 was released after this conversation take place at 
> > linux-xfs,
> > maybe add something like this:
> >
> > #ifdef XSCALE
> >     /* We need this because some gcc versions for xscale are broken. */
> >     [patched version here]
> > #else
> >     [original version here]
> > #endif
> 
> no, just fix your compiler or let the gcc folks do it.  Did anyone of
> the arm folks ever open a PR at the gcc bugzilla with a reproduced
> testcase?  You're never get your compiler fixed with that attitude.

Yes, but a lof of people use older versions of compilers and suffer
from this bug.
I personally was very unhappy when lost my data.

Best regards,
        Yura


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>