xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS corruption on move from xscale to i686

To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS corruption on move from xscale to i686
From: Yura Pakhuchiy <pakhuchiy@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 16:50:01 +0300
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tibor@xxxxxxxxxxx, pakhuchiy@xxxxxxxx
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=kNJ2AwyGlG338hbwHhQmymMYQqriCfC5aq1muszLzz6aJdTNDMPb592M/mJeQC8vv2A0r912c3th9j7jJDVlnMDwDeG2u3Pzg1lhHyEERyXRYQBIjdRUeuC2A5qzJs0Kel1IMucEgG6p6wA7OyeyPgm0BGOTmTYbOEa0rmwq1H8=
In-reply-to: <20050714012048.GB937@frodo>
References: <1120756552.5298.10.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050708042146.GA1679@frodo> <60868aed0507130822c2e9e97@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050714012048.GB937@frodo>
Reply-to: Yura Pakhuchiy <pakhuchiy@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
2005/7/14, Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 06:22:28PM +0300, Yura Pakhuchiy wrote:
> > I found patch by Greg Ungreger to fix this problem, but why it's still
> > not in mainline? Or it's a gcc problem and should be fixed by gcc folks?
> 
> Yes, IIRC the patch was incorrect for other platforms, and it sure
> looked like an arm-specific gcc problem (this was ages back, so
> perhaps its fixed by now).

AFAIR gcc-3.4.3 was released after this conversation take place at linux-xfs,
maybe add something like this:

#ifdef XSCALE
    /* We need this because some gcc versions for xscale are broken. */
    [patched version here]
#else
    [original version here]
#endif

Best regards,
        Yura


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>