[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS, 4K stacks, and Red Hat

To: Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS, 4K stacks, and Red Hat
From: Net Llama! <netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 09:58:48 -0500 (EST)
Cc: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>, Joshua Baker-LePain <jlb17@xxxxxxxx>, Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>, Linux xfs mailing list <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <9807.1120803197@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <9807.1120803197@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Keith Owens wrote:

> On Fri, 8 Jul 2005 14:37:40 +1000,
> Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >Choose SLES9 over RHEL4 if you want an "Enterprise" kernel with
> >decent XFS support.
> Plus the fact that SLES9 comes with a kernel debugger, unlike RHEL.

And a wonderful collection of bugs that need the debugger to be debugged

No offense to any SuSE fans here, but SLES9 is one of the most unstable,
buggy distributions I've ever used, at least with x86_64 CPUs.

Lonni J Friedman                        netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
LlamaLand                               http://netllama.linux-sxs.org

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>