xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS, 4K stacks, and Red Hat

To: Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS, 4K stacks, and Red Hat
From: Net Llama! <netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 09:58:48 -0500 (EST)
Cc: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>, Joshua Baker-LePain <jlb17@xxxxxxxx>, Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>, Linux xfs mailing list <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <9807.1120803197@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <9807.1120803197@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Keith Owens wrote:

> On Fri, 8 Jul 2005 14:37:40 +1000,
> Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >Choose SLES9 over RHEL4 if you want an "Enterprise" kernel with
> >decent XFS support.
>
> Plus the fact that SLES9 comes with a kernel debugger, unlike RHEL.

And a wonderful collection of bugs that need the debugger to be debugged
;)

No offense to any SuSE fans here, but SLES9 is one of the most unstable,
buggy distributions I've ever used, at least with x86_64 CPUs.

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Lonni J Friedman                        netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
LlamaLand                               http://netllama.linux-sxs.org


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>