| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS corruption during power-blackout |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 7 Jul 2005 14:36:43 +1000 |
| In-reply-to: | <20050707043634.GK25980@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20050705181057.GA16422@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200507060424.HAA27591@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050706112719.GA18969@xxxxxxxxxx> <20050707025607.GJ25980@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050707034417.GC1070@frodo> <20050707043634.GK25980@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.3i |
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 08:36:35PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote: > On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 01:44:18PM +1000, Nathan Scott wrote: > the attr should't be that difficult to add, mainly depends how much > granularity is currently allowed in your dirsync code. +S is easy > since it basically just forces O_SYNC flags on all open() calls, can > this work the same? I'd not expect these things to be difficult to add. > also is dirsync 2.6 only? or am I thinking of something else. Thats right, its 2.6 only. cheers. -- Nathan
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS corruption during power-blackout, Ethan Benson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | XFS, 4K stacks, and Red Hat, Joshua Baker-LePain |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS corruption during power-blackout, Ethan Benson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS corruption during power-blackout, Ric Wheeler |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |