| To: | David Masover <ninja@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS corruption during power-blackout |
| From: | Jörn Engel <joern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 1 Jul 2005 23:10:06 +0200 |
| Cc: | Bryan Henderson <hbryan@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ric Wheeler <ric@xxxxxxx>, Al Boldi <a1426z@xxxxxxxxx>, Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>, "'Nathan Scott'" <nathans@xxxxxxx>, reiserfs-list@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <42C5A06F.40906@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <OF23DC8299.F6F2200B-ON88257031.005B3A9B-88257031.00650D8F@xxxxxxxxxx> <42C5A06F.40906@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Fri, 1 July 2005 14:58:39 -0500, David Masover wrote: > Bryan Henderson wrote: > [...] > >What you'd really like is to fsync a multi-file unit of work (transaction) > >-- and not just among open files. You'd like to open, write, and close > >1000 files in a single transaction and then commit that transaction, with > >no syncing due to timers in the meantime. If you're really greedy, you'd > >also ask for complete rollback if the system fails before the commit. > > Both of these are planned for Reiser4. Or is it 4.1? Both are pretty trivial to implement for a tree-based fs like reiserfs. Non-trivial is the user interface. Not sure if sys_reiser is the answer to that. Jörn -- When people work hard for you for a pat on the back, you've got to give them that pat. -- Robert Heinlein |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS corruption during power-blackout, David Masover |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS corruption during power-blackout, David Masover |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS corruption during power-blackout, David Masover |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS corruption during power-blackout, David Masover |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |