xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: why is log version=1 default?

from [Chris Wedgwood] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Tim Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: why is log version=1 default?
From: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 21:46:34 -0700
Cc: Ed <spied@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050606151045.P1319708@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <42A0AE93.6010001@xxxxxxxxx> <20050606151045.P1319708@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx 
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 03:10:45PM +1000, Tim Shimmin wrote:

> The only problem would be if you wanted to mount the filesystem
> using a linux kernel predating around June 2002 and/or mounting on
> an IRIX kernel prior to 6.5.26.

Does IRIX 6.5.26 support v2 directories anyway?
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: right su and sw values for raid 10, Nathan Scott
Next by Date:  Re: why is log version=1 default?, Tim Shimmin
Previous by Thread:  Re: why is log version=1 default?, Tim Shimmin
Next by Thread:  Re: why is log version=1 default?, Tim Shimmin
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]