| To: | James Chapman <jchapman@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Files >4GB in XFS realtime partition |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 03 Jun 2005 07:13:12 -0500 |
| Cc: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <42A0438E.1070202@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <428B4CC0.70702@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20050603020224.GE1021@frodo> <42A0438E.1070202@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Macintosh/20050317) |
James Chapman wrote: Hi Nathan,Eric Sandeen asked me to reproduce this on an x86 but I've been unable to find time to do so yet. I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I'll try to test with a 2.4.29 kernel./james James, testing Nathan's case with xfs_io on your normal arch would be good too, and more useful at this point. If that fails, I wonder how hard it would be for you to take ulibc out of the equation... -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Files >4GB in XFS realtime partition, James Chapman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS w/RT, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Files >4GB in XFS realtime partition, James Chapman |
| Next by Thread: | TAKE 937235 - mkfs vs MD0/1, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |