[Top] [All Lists]

Re: False No space left on device error

To: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: False No space left on device error
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 14:07:46 -0500
Cc: Jan Derfinak <ja@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <598937.75f59e30faa49a9d1a48e7ee592eae21.ANY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <BE5986C67D271E4EA72B61F406AB91F29C7C86@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <429E7FDA.7070307@xxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0506021444230.18757@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <429F091E.6090105@xxxxxxx> <598937.75f59e30faa49a9d1a48e7ee592eae21.ANY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206)
Chris Wedgwood wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 08:26:54AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:

ino64 is testing only; it artificially forces ALL inodes into 64

maybe s/ino64/force_no64/ then?

ah, ino64 has the weight of history behind it now. :) I agree it's not obvious. But then it's not a documented/supported option anyway. Until I let the cat out of the bag on the list, you'd have to read the source to find out about it anyway! :)


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>