| To: | Sonny Rao <sonny@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS module for RHEL4 |
| From: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 2 Jun 2005 02:28:44 -0700 |
| Cc: | Robin Humble <rjh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Wayne Steenburg <w.steenburg@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20050602085703.GA20593@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1117576633.5018.12.camel@FC3Work> <20050601035347.GB20301@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050601061802.GB7359@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <620614.d53037961dceb73fbe2a31af34e1bb64.ANY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050602085703.GA20593@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 04:57:03AM -0400, Sonny Rao wrote: > Is it just when you have XFS + LVM + NFS that the stack problems > show up the most? I've used XFS + NFS on a 4k-stack kernel w/out > any problems. the more things "in the chain" (stacked as it were) the more likely problems will occur. how bad each component is and how many are needed i'm not sure. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS module for RHEL4, Sonny Rao |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: False No space left on device error, Jan Derfinak |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS module for RHEL4, Sonny Rao |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS module for RHEL4, Sonny Rao |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |