| To: | J?rn Engel <joern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS corruption during power-blackout |
| From: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 30 Jun 2005 13:32:23 -0700 |
| Cc: | Bryan Henderson <hbryan@xxxxxxxxxx>, Al Boldi <a1426z@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>, "'Nathan Scott'" <nathans@xxxxxxx>, reiserfs-list@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050630194437.GC8374@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> |
| References: | <254889.27725ab660aa106eb6acc07307d71ef1fbd5b6fd366aebef9e2f611750fbcb467e46e8a4.IBX@taniwha.stupidest.org> <OFC7BE2BBA.42F70A93-ON88257030.00595A48-88257030.005A99A3@us.ibm.com> <054069.b93858d6b97c07747dc32be2dd8981b254d981528781006053dce7be58de88865a43b162.IBX@taniwha.stupidest.org> <20050630194437.GC8374@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 09:44:37PM +0200, J?rn Engel wrote: > Or do you rather mean that a single sync() should block until all data > currently present is hardened? Logically sync() should return only after all dirty buffers that existed before sync() was called are flushed. Anything more than this (i.e. waiting on newly (since sync was called but before it returns) dirtied buffers) could live-lock (actually, this used to happen sometimes, I don't know if that's the case). |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS corruption during power-blackout, Jörn Engel |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS corruption during power-blackout, Bryan Henderson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS corruption during power-blackout, Jörn Engel |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS corruption during power-blackout, Jörn Engel |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |