RE: Opteron Systems

xfs

RE: Opteron Systems

To:	"'Björn JACKE'" <bj@xxxxxxxxx>, "'Tim Shimmin'" <tes@xxxxxxx>
Subject:	RE: Opteron Systems
From:	"Mike Gigante" <mg@xxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 30 Jun 2005 11:51:36 +1000
Cc:	"'Steve Lord'" <lord@xxxxxxx>, "'Joshua Schmidlkofer'" <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to:	<E1DnCNe-0004Im-00@intern.SerNet.DE>
Organization:	SGI
Reply-to:	<mg@xxxxxxx>
Sender:	linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AcV7w89/XwHputJ8S5ezbnhbOcvHWgBUhTxA

There are no plans to provide xfs_reno on Linux.

The principal reason for xfs_reno was to deal with legacy Irix XFS
filesystems that were created before inode32 was available.

Mike

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Opteron Systems, Joshua Schmidlkofer Re: Opteron Systems, Steve Lord Re: Opteron Systems, Tim Shimmin Re: Opteron Systems, Björn JACKE Re: Opteron Systems, Tim Shimmin RE: Opteron Systems, Mike Gigante <=

Previous by Date:	Re: Opteron Systems, Tim Shimmin
Next by Date:	Re: SPAM: Re: XFS corruption during power-blackout, Chris Wedgwood
Previous by Thread:	Re: Opteron Systems, Tim Shimmin
Next by Thread:	TAKE 938502 - xfs_bmapi does not free space after ENOSPC, David Chinner
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]