| To: | Ed <spied@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: right su and sw values for raid 10 |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 8 Jun 2005 10:17:03 +1000 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <42A54124.4060007@yandex.ru>; from spied@yandex.ru on Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 10:39:32AM +0400 |
| References: | <42A08C35.9080402@yandex.ru> <42A54124.4060007@yandex.ru> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 10:39:32AM +0400, Ed wrote: > Ed wrote: > > > can you help me select right su and sw parameters for hardware raid 10 > > (4 disks, 128kb stripe)? > > > i found this message: "TAKE 937235 - mkfs vs MD0/1". > it's right don't use sunit and swidth for raid 10? No. Look thru the CVS code in xfsprogs/libdisk/md.c -- you should be able to figure out the right thing for your setup from that. If you're keen, and your RAID device driver exports its geometry, you could add some new libdisk code for your device. cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | TAKE 937447 - minor warning cleanup, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: why is log version=1 default?, Chris Wedgwood |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: right su and sw values for raid 10, Ed |
| Next by Thread: | why is log version=1 default?, Ed |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |