xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: out of the tree compilation and 4KSTACKS

from [Chris Wedgwood] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Robin Humble <rjh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: out of the tree compilation and 4KSTACKS
From: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 01:10:08 -0700
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20050601060509.GA7359@lemming.cita.utoronto.ca>
References: <20050531074820.GM8770@neu.nirvana> <462608.672469a40d5f4a17f7b1f43a4517535a.ANY@taniwha.stupidest.org> <20050531215402.GE23991@neu.nirvana> <477395.f3b7fdadc14ce50b8c44d1f319df1ab6.IBX@taniwha.stupidest.org> <20050601034202.GA31105@neu.nirvana> <20050601040009.GA11354@taniwha.stupidest.org> <20050601060509.GA7359@lemming.cita.utoronto.ca>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx 
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 02:05:09AM -0400, Robin Humble wrote:

> I think RedHat are mistaken.
>   http://oss.sgi.com/archives/linux-xfs/2005-03/msg00189.html

I'm pretty sure they will argue that for what most of their customers
do ext3 is as faster and somewhat leaner and more reliable than the
alternatives.
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  TAKE 904196 - merge up to 2.4.31, Nathan Scott
Next by Date:  XFS w/RT, Arthur
Previous by Thread:  Re: out of the tree compilation and 4KSTACKS, Axel Thimm
Next by Thread:  TAKE 907752 - xfstests, FSG QA
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]