| To: | Robin Humble <rjh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS module for RHEL4 |
| From: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 2 Jun 2005 02:06:41 -0700 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Wayne Steenburg <w.steenburg@xxxxxxxxxx>, sonny@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050601061802.GB7359@lemming.cita.utoronto.ca> |
| References: | <1117576633.5018.12.camel@FC3Work> <20050601035347.GB20301@kevlar.burdell.org> <20050601061802.GB7359@lemming.cita.utoronto.ca> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 02:18:02AM -0400, Robin Humble wrote: > if you want 8k stacks as well (highly recommended for servers) then > unfortunately it's not quite that simple. you need to stop some of > the RedHat patches being applied RH is aware of this and the next release will correct this > as (for some unknown and possibly insane reason) RedHat removed the > 8k stack option entirely... I wasn't aware of that. I'll ask next time I remember. > OTOH, I run fc3 at home with the default kernel (4k stacks) and XFS > and it's very stable. So for simple workloads and setups 4k stacks > are usually fine. XFS on most IDE/SCSI drives with RAID, dm, LVM, etc. should be OK. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | TAKE 907752 - xfstests, FSG QA |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS module for RHEL4, Sonny Rao |
| Previous by Thread: | TAKE 907752 - xfstests, FSG QA |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS module for RHEL4, Sonny Rao |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |