| To: | David Kewley <kewley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 4k stacks on 32-bit, 8k stacks on 64-bit |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 26 May 2005 23:23:28 -0500 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200505261518.56673.kewley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <200505252241.26815.kewley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <429608A2.8060702@xxxxxxx> <200505261518.56673.kewley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Macintosh/20050317) |
David Kewley wrote: On Thursday 26 May 2005 10:34, Eric Sandeen wrote:If you just run local xfs without stacking other drivers above/below it in the IO chain, you'll be less likely to hit a problem.Thanks Eric. Unfortunately, my typical application has a stack like this:3w-9xxx (JBOD since hw RAID5 is extremely slow in my hands) md (RAID 6) lvm2 xfs nfsWhat's your educated guess about the likelihood of hitting problems with this stack, assuming ~10 busy nfs clients? on ia32 you're doomed. on x86_64 I'd test it. :) -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 4k stacks on 32-bit, 8k stacks on 64-bit, David Kewley |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 4k stacks on 32-bit, 8k stacks on 64-bit, David Kewley |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 4k stacks on 32-bit, 8k stacks on 64-bit, David Kewley |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 4k stacks on 32-bit, 8k stacks on 64-bit, David Kewley |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |