| To: | Gaspar Bakos <gbakos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS, RAID-5, 3ware |
| From: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 23 May 2005 20:08:07 -0700 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.SOL.4.58.0505232234410.2452@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.SOL.4.58.0505191735250.26773@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <c4cbdce7bad01d946ce6fa0c57872567.ANY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.SOL.4.58.0505232234410.2452@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 10:46:13PM -0400, Gaspar Bakos wrote: > Here you refer to the kernel page-size? yes > > 512-bytes is the minimum you can get away with to spread inodes out > > evenly over a volume larger than 2TB > > Ok, I see. i should qualify that though that for >4TB you will need larger inodes again but at that point i think using a 32-bit CPU won't be very common > What tests do you think of? whatever matches you usage pattern, this is why i mentioned that the strip-size doesn't necessarily have some *magic* value --- it will vary somewhat depending on what your writes look like |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS, RAID-5, 3ware, Gaspar Bakos |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | reproducing script: __lookup_hash oops, Takeshi HASEGAWA |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS, RAID-5, 3ware, Gaspar Bakos |
| Next by Thread: | DMAPI support, Barnaby, Marty L |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |