xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: kernel OOPS for XFS in xfs_iget_core (using NFS+SMP+MD)

To: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: kernel OOPS for XFS in xfs_iget_core (using NFS+SMP+MD)
From: Jakob Oestergaard <jakob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 21:52:51 +0200
Cc: Gregory Brauer <greg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050518175925.GA22738@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: Jakob Oestergaard <jakob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>, Gregory Brauer <greg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <428511F8.6020303@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050514184711.GA27565@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <428B7D7F.9000107@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050518175925.GA22738@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 10:59:25AM -0700, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 10:38:07AM -0700, Gregory Brauer wrote:
> 
> > May 18 02:59:47 violet kernel: xfs_iget_core: ambiguous vns: vp/0xf53f8ac8, 
> > invp/0xe49ccc4c
> 
> I'm pretty sure it's NFS that aggravates this --- can anyone recall
> why?

Not why no - but there where *major* problems with SMP+NFS+XFS up until
2.6.11.

I run 2.6.11(.8/9) on both SMP (dual athlon) and NUMA (64 bit kernel on
dual opteron) with NFS and XFS and haven't yet seen any problems (knock
the wood).

Seriously, any 2.6 earlier than .11 is *unusable* for file serving over
NFS (at least with XFS which at the moment is the only FS with
journalled quota so at least for me that's the only option).

-- 

 / jakob


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>