xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: 8k stacks - where did they go?

from [Chris Wedgwood] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Net Llama! <netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 8k stacks - where did they go?
From: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 16:19:04 -0700
Cc: Nathan Straz <nstraz@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0505091612050.26341@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0505091525550.26341@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050509213914.GE26337@xxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0505091553080.26341@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050509220613.GA22371@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0505091612050.26341@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx 
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 04:12:46PM -0500, Net Llama! wrote:

> I don't suppose you (or anyone else) knows if the 2.6.9-5-smp-x86_64
> kernel in RHEL4 is using 8k?

AFAIK everyone is usong 8K stacks for x86-64 kernels right now.

FWIW x86-64 seems like it probably uses *less* stack space than x86
(quite a bit in some cases) so I wouldn't worry too much at present.
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: XFS on 2.4 Tib raid, Dave Chinner
Next by Date:  Re: XFS on 2.4 Tib raid, Chris Wedgwood
Previous by Thread:  Re: 8k stacks - where did they go?, Net Llama!
Next by Thread:  Re: 8k stacks - where did they go?, Martin Schröder
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]