xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: 8k stacks - where did they go?

from [Net Llama!] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 8k stacks - where did they go?
From: Net Llama! <netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 16:12:46 -0500 (EST)
Cc: Nathan Straz <nstraz@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050509220613.GA22371@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0505091525550.26341@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050509213914.GE26337@xxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0505091553080.26341@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050509220613.GA22371@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx 
On Mon, 9 May 2005, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 03:53:29PM -0500, Net Llama! wrote:
>
> > So i get 8k by default on x86_64 ?
>
> For now x86_64 uses 8K stacks (there has been talk of this changing to
> 4K stacks eventually in some distros though).

OK, thanks.

I don't suppose you (or anyone else) knows if the 2.6.9-5-smp-x86_64
kernel in RHEL4 is using 8k?

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Lonni J Friedman                        netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
LlamaLand                               http://netllama.linux-sxs.org
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: 8k stacks - where did they go?, Chris Wedgwood
Next by Date:  Re: XFS on 2.4 Tib raid, Dave Chinner
Previous by Thread:  Re: 8k stacks - where did they go?, Chris Wedgwood
Next by Thread:  Re: 8k stacks - where did they go?, Chris Wedgwood
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]