| To: | Greg Freemyer <greg.freemyer@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Recommend XFS enabled Linux Distribution |
| From: | Christian Guggenberger <christian.guggenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 3 May 2005 21:02:26 +0200 |
| Cc: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>, Net Llama! <netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Wilkins, Vern" <vwilkins@xxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <87f94c37050503110379fbacdf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <F62740B0EFCFC74AA6DCF52CD746242D01033A69@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0505031145020.14935@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4277BA12.4020206@xxxxxxx> <87f94c37050503110379fbacdf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | christian.guggenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 02:03:45PM -0400, Greg Freemyer wrote: > On 5/3/05, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > SuSE SLES9 would be a good choice. SGI works with SuSE to ensure that > > the xfs code in that distro is in good shape. > > > > -Eric > > > If you go with SLES9, be sure to get SP2 (in beta right now). SUSE > has a lot of device mapper (LVM2), multipath, and drbd issues resolved > in SP2 from what I understand. > could you me point to some details regarding the lvm2 issues solved in the beta of SP2? thanks in advance, - Christian |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Recommend XFS enabled Linux Distribution, Greg Freemyer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Recommend XFS enabled Linux Distribution, Greg Freemyer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Recommend XFS enabled Linux Distribution, Greg Freemyer |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Recommend XFS enabled Linux Distribution, Greg Freemyer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |