xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Recommend XFS enabled Linux Distribution

To: Greg Freemyer <greg.freemyer@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Recommend XFS enabled Linux Distribution
From: Christian Guggenberger <christian.guggenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 21:02:26 +0200
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>, Net Llama! <netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Wilkins, Vern" <vwilkins@xxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <87f94c37050503110379fbacdf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <F62740B0EFCFC74AA6DCF52CD746242D01033A69@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0505031145020.14935@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4277BA12.4020206@xxxxxxx> <87f94c37050503110379fbacdf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: christian.guggenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 02:03:45PM -0400, Greg Freemyer wrote:
> On 5/3/05, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > SuSE SLES9 would be a good choice.  SGI works with SuSE to ensure that
> > the xfs code in that distro is in good shape.
> > 
> > -Eric
> > 
> If you go with SLES9, be sure to get SP2 (in beta right now).  SUSE
> has a lot of device mapper (LVM2), multipath, and drbd issues resolved
> in SP2 from what I understand.
> 

could you me point to some details regarding the lvm2 issues solved in the
beta of SP2?

thanks in advance,
 - Christian
 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>