| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: out of the tree compilation and 4KSTACKS |
| From: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 31 May 2005 21:00:09 -0700 |
| Cc: | Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20050601034202.GA31105@neu.nirvana> |
| References: | <20050531074820.GM8770@neu.nirvana> <462608.672469a40d5f4a17f7b1f43a4517535a.ANY@taniwha.stupidest.org> <20050531215402.GE23991@neu.nirvana> <477395.f3b7fdadc14ce50b8c44d1f319df1ab6.IBX@taniwha.stupidest.org> <20050601034202.GA31105@neu.nirvana> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 05:42:02AM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > > It is on already on RHEL isn't it? > > No. That's the whole point of this exercise ;) I'm saying I thought RH kernels defaulted to using CONFIG_4KSTACKS don't they? > The advantage is no xfs vs xfs. When I talked (bitched?) to some RH people about the problems with XFS and 4KSTACKS they claimed that ext3 is faster than XFS is pretty much any meaningful benchmark on 8-CPU machines or smaller. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: out of the tree compilation and 4KSTACKS, Axel Thimm |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS module for RHEL4, Sonny Rao |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: out of the tree compilation and 4KSTACKS, Axel Thimm |
| Next by Thread: | Re: out of the tree compilation and 4KSTACKS, Sonny Rao |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |