| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 4k stacks on 32-bit, 8k stacks on 64-bit |
| From: | David Kewley <kewley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 26 May 2005 15:18:56 -0700 |
| In-reply-to: | <429608A2.8060702@sgi.com> |
| Organization: | Caltech GPS / ITS SMS |
| References: | <200505252241.26815.kewley@gps.caltech.edu> <429608A2.8060702@sgi.com> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.8 |
On Thursday 26 May 2005 10:34, Eric Sandeen wrote: > If you just run local xfs without stacking other drivers above/below > it in the IO chain, you'll be less likely to hit a problem. Thanks Eric. Unfortunately, my typical application has a stack like this: 3w-9xxx (JBOD since hw RAID5 is extremely slow in my hands) md (RAID 6) lvm2 xfs nfs What's your educated guess about the likelihood of hitting problems with this stack, assuming ~10 busy nfs clients? David |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 4k stacks on 32-bit, 8k stacks on 64-bit, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 4k stacks on 32-bit, 8k stacks on 64-bit, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 4k stacks on 32-bit, 8k stacks on 64-bit, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 4k stacks on 32-bit, 8k stacks on 64-bit, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |