| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | 4k stacks on 32-bit, 8k stacks on 64-bit |
| From: | David Kewley <kewley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 25 May 2005 22:41:26 -0700 |
| Organization: | Caltech ITS |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.6.2 |
How is xfs doing these days with 4k stacks on x86 systems, or 8k stacks on x86_64? I'm running RHEL 4, with xfs enabled in a kernel directly derived from the RHEL 4 kernel. I'm on x86_64, and until today, I thought I was safe stackwise because x86_64 keeps 8k stacks even when x86 is 4k. But Dave Jones has confirmed that stack objects are twice as big on x86_64 as on x86, so I'm in as much danger for stack overflow as x86 is with 4k stacks. Agreed so far? How big is the danger, and what can I do to avoid it? David |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: msg00264; Cant create new files, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: msg00264; Cant create new files, Shinya Sakamoto |
| Previous by Thread: | msg00264; Cant create new files, Shinya Sakamoto |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 4k stacks on 32-bit, 8k stacks on 64-bit, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |