xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: msg00264; Cant create new files

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: msg00264; Cant create new files
From: Net Llama! <netllama@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 19:55:54 -0700
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:organization:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from; b=lsqjWtsX0R9fCLMo4IzFyu02vCP8dBS52ME/dmM+dITvJC01JaL+1Cl0DqgYUMtHIkymAdzND+IBSu+koWS/dDSNrMyVBJDIy9vy4mcS6c4cRAN4TdC0ORrlzneX/vk7P8K3AXitaTBYi5OeSq6LjtDOlRmLfBm0W89F27eIImo=
In-reply-to: <06d001c5619d$35b6f670$170a0e0a@FD3S>
Organization: HAL V
References: <06d001c5619d$35b6f670$170a0e0a@FD3S>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050317)
Which kernel version?  Which version of xfsprogs?
Are you using LVM or NFS, or anything else?  How big are the files?  Is
this x86 or x86_64?

On 05/25/2005 07:47 PM, Shinya Sakamoto wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> Our xfs fileserver had a trouble. It was unable to create a file with "no 
> space left on device" message but had 0.6TB (40%) space available. When we 
> delete one file, we can create one file. In other words, it was unable to 
> increase in number of files/directories. xfs_check and xfs_repair results no 
> errors and no fixes.
> 
> We look for the cause and solution, then we find the msg00264 (2003-07) is 
> very similer to our situation. But, we cannot find what was the cause and 
> solution in the thread.
> 
> Does somebody know how it goes or what was the cause and solution? Or, if 
> someone who had similar situation and found the solution, please let us know 
> about it. Any infomation will be appriciate for us.
> 
> Regards,
> Shinya Sakamoto 
> 
> 


-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
L. Friedman                                    netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
LlamaLand                               http://netllama.linux-sxs.org

 19:50:01 up 44 days,  6:04,  1 user,  load average: 0.47, 0.45, 0.34


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>