xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: SAN resizing disk, no LVM

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: SAN resizing disk, no LVM
From: David Sparks <daves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 12:54:15 -0700
In-reply-to: <22029.1114645639@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <22029.1114645639@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: daves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050330)
> Your partition "correction" overwrote the first 512 bytes of the first
> XFS superblock.  Fortunately xfs_repair can recover from that condition
> by using a backup superblock.

How big is the superblock?  Was only the superblock damaged by "fixing"
the partition table with fdisk?  One could just rename fdisk on machines
directly attached to the storage to prevent accidental damage. (very cheesy)

The reason that I'm asking these questions is that LVM does not seem to
work well with resizing of the physical disks -- you need to create a
new physical volume and then add that in.

Thanks,

ds


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>