| To: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [xfs-masters] swsusp vs. xfs [was Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1] |
| From: | Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 12 Apr 2005 13:04:25 +0200 |
| Cc: | "Barry K. Nathan" <barryn@xxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, hare@xxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050412002603.GA1178@frodo> |
| References: | <20050408103327.GD1392@xxxxxxxxxx> <20050410211808.GA12118@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050410212747.GB26316@xxxxxxxxxx> <20050410225708.GB12118@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050410230053.GD12794@xxxxxxxxxx> <20050411043124.GA24626@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050411105759.GB1373@xxxxxxxxxx> <20050411231213.GD702@frodo> <20050411235110.GA2472@xxxxxxxxxx> <20050412002603.GA1178@frodo> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
Hi!
> > I should take some sleep now, so I can't test the patch, but I don't
> > think it will help. If someone has PF_FREEZE set, he should be in
> > refrigerator.
>
> OK, so if that doesn't help, here's an alternate approach - this
> lets xfsbufd track when its entering the refrigerator(), so that
> other callers know that attempts to wake it are futile.
Thanks, this patch helped.
Pavel
--
Boycott Kodak -- for their patent abuse against Java.
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Bug 406] gentoo-ppc64 : XFS dies under load, bugzilla-daemon |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [xfs-masters] swsusp vs. xfs [was Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1], Barry K. Nathan |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [xfs-masters] swsusp vs. xfs [was Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1], Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [xfs-masters] swsusp vs. xfs [was Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1], Barry K. Nathan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |