xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: realtime ( was RE: unexpected high fragmentation, any ideas? )

To: "Nathan Scott" <nathans@xxxxxxx>, "Steve Lord" <lord@xxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: realtime ( was RE: unexpected high fragmentation, any ideas? )
From: "Scott Fagg" <scott.fagg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 12:17:22 +1000
Cc: <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcU7Fh+nF2eYS24nTHqBDFgwpBqZfwAAYtmQ
Thread-topic: realtime ( was RE: unexpected high fragmentation, any ideas? )
I might give this a go... 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nathan Scott [mailto:nathans@xxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Thursday, 7 April 2005 11:59 AM
> To: Scott Fagg; Steve Lord
> Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: realtime ( was RE: unexpected high 
> fragmentation, any ideas? )
> 
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 08:49:54PM -0500, Steve Lord wrote:
> >  o In order to get a file to live on the realtime 
> subvolume, you have
> >    to use a special ioctl call on the file descriptor after it is
> >    opened and before any space is allocated.
> 
> Actually, theres an easy way to do this now which doesn't require
> applications to know about realtime volumes - a directory can have
> the "realtime-inherit" flag set on it (e.g. via xfs_io) and files
> subsequently created in that directory will automatically be marked
> as realtime (at creation time).
> 
> I would be surprised if there aren't one or two bugs remaining in
> the realtime port for Linux, as Steve pointed out, but there is a
> decent foundation with years of testing on IRIX for the core code,
> so it shouldn't be too hard to knock out any remaining issues (if
> someone wanted to give it a go..)
> 
> cheers.
> 
> -- 
> Nathan
> 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>