| To: | David Chalmers <david.chalmers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs_repair core dump |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 2 Mar 2005 21:12:14 +1100 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <BE4BAC21.411%david.chalmers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from david.chalmers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 05:45:05PM +1100 |
| References: | <BE4BAC21.411%david.chalmers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 05:45:05PM +1100, David Chalmers wrote: > Phase 6 - check inode connectivity... > - resetting contents of realtime bitmap and summary inodes > - ensuring existence of lost+found directory > - traversing filesystem starting at / ... > - traversal finished ... > - traversing all unattached subtrees ... > rebuilding directory inode 4162080125 > xfs_repair: phase6.c:2604: longform_dir2_rebuild_finish: Assertion `error == > 0' > failed. > Abort (core dumped) > > Can anybody suggest how to to get around this problem? Building a non-debug version of the tools will remove the assert. The filesystem will likely not be 100% fixed, but repair should finish and you'll be much closer to a working system. cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | xfs_repair core dump, David Chalmers |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Optimal Setup Question, Chris Penney |
| Previous by Thread: | xfs_repair core dump, David Chalmers |
| Next by Thread: | Optimal Setup Question, Chris Penney |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |