xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: fc3 and stacks

To: Robin Humble <rjh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: fc3 and stacks
From: Joshua Baker-LePain <jlb17@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 17:47:18 -0500 (EST)
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050324224234.GB9771@lemming.cita.utoronto.ca>
References: <20050310232036.GA19295@lemming.cita.utoronto.ca> <4234E903.8010309@thebarn.com> <4235D44F.1020902@tippett.com> <20050314190915.GB9784@lemming.cita.utoronto.ca> <4235F824.6070303@sgi.com> <20050315044606.GA32635@lemming.cita.utoronto.ca> <20050320212509.GA11859@lemming.cita.utoronto.ca> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0503210737130.6805@chaos.egr.duke.edu> <20050324224234.GB9771@lemming.cita.utoronto.ca>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 at 5:42pm, Robin Humble wrote

> On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 07:40:53AM -0500, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:

> >Hrm.  I had exactly the opposite experience.  My testbed was far older 
> >(and simpler) -- dual PIII 450, 384MB RAM, AIC-7890 controller and 2 SCSI 
> >disks (not in any sort of RAID or anything).  I was running RHEL4 on it 
> >with the kernel modified simply to turn on XFS support.
> >'tiobench --size 2047' would reliably produce stack overflows.
> 
> Hmmm. interesting.
> 
> <insert another couple of days of testing>

*snip*

> Perhaps your results can be explained if the aic7xxx driver is a lot
> more stack-heavy than the 3ware driver that we are using?

Could be.  I'm getting a new dual 3ware 9500 based system soon, and I'll 
certainly be testing that as well.

> Or if you are exercising multiple XFS partitions at the same time?

No, just one.

-- 
Joshua Baker-LePain
Department of Biomedical Engineering
Duke University


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>