| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: DMAPI implementation about undeliverable event messages |
| From: | Aurelien Degremont - Stagiaire <degremont@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 08 Mar 2005 15:25:45 +0100 |
| In-reply-to: | <20050307164529.E2FDD4FDD1@chewtoy.americas.sgi.com> |
| References: | <20050307164529.E2FDD4FDD1@chewtoy.americas.sgi.com> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fr-FR; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 |
Dean Roehrich a écrit :
There's a comment header for dm_send_unmount_event() that talks about some issues with this being a synchronous event. The spec still says it is synchronous: Maybe if the event is raised sooner, before the dmapi handle is disabled, this could solved the issue. (dm_path_to_fshandle() should still be runnable as long as the unmount event was not replied, or, at least, delivered but in outstanding state). I have't look at the code, i don't know whether it is possible or not.
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: DMAPI implementation about undeliverable event messages, Aurelien Degremont - Stagiaire |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: oops when calling dm_set_disp(), Dean Roehrich |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: DMAPI implementation about undeliverable event messages, Dean Roehrich |
| Next by Thread: | Re: DMAPI implementation about undeliverable event messages, Dean Roehrich |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |