| To: | linux xfs mailing list <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: the thing with the binary zeroes |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | 11 Feb 2005 15:25:18 +0100 |
| Date: | Fri, 11 Feb 2005 15:25:18 +0100 |
| In-reply-to: | <20050211140620.GA3932@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20050211121829.GA30049@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <m1sm43uu8h.fsf@xxxxxx> <20050211131546.GA32336@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <m1oeeruswr.fsf@xxxxxx> <20050211133558.GA32501@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <m1k6pfurpd.fsf@xxxxxx> <20050211140620.GA3932@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
> I have heard of cases where booting another (previous) kernel gave > access to the files again. So I guess it can happen that the new > data are written to the same extents in which the old data resided > (for instance, if the file was shortened). > > Why would it be possible to access the data with a previous kernel, > but only see zeroes with a newer version? Sounds more like a urban legend. -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: the thing with the binary zeroes, martin f krafft |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | multithreaded processors and xfs, Pablo Cruz Navea |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: the thing with the binary zeroes, martin f krafft |
| Next by Thread: | Re: the thing with the binary zeroes, David J N Begley |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |