| To: | Sonny Rao <sonny@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Delayed Allocation Question |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 8 Feb 2005 08:41:42 +1100 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4207C7C9.8060005@xxxxxxx>; from lord@xxxxxxx on Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 01:55:53PM -0600 |
| References: | <20050207173755.GA24277@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4207C7C9.8060005@xxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 01:55:53PM -0600, Steve Lord wrote: > Sonny Rao wrote: > > Random question: If a file is being written (to memory) and hasn't > > been allocated, then will calling the FIBMAP-ioctl on that file force > > allocation ? > > > > Yes, at least it did last time I looked. Otherwise things like lilo > fall over in a heap. Yep, still does - see linvfs_bmap, which calls fs_flush_pages before doing the generic_block_bmap. cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Delayed Allocation Question, Sonny Rao |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | 2.6.11-rc3: 80-95% systime when serving files via NFS, Anders Saaby |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Delayed Allocation Question, Sonny Rao |
| Next by Thread: | 2.6.11-rc3: 80-95% systime when serving files via NFS, Anders Saaby |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |