| To: | "Jameel Akari" <jakari@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: du vs. df inconsistency |
| From: | Roberto <roberto.trovo@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 4 Feb 2005 09:08:35 +0100 (CET) |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Importance: | Normal |
| In-reply-to: | <4202D839.2090003@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.OSF.4.61.0502030956450.28806@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4202D839.2090003@xxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | SquirrelMail/1.4.2 |
> Jameel Akari wrote: > >> Anything else I can try before I dump the fs and make a new one? > > Does the problem persist immediately after remounting the fs? > > -eric > > > Yes, this could be an interesting test: I remember (some times ago) on this list a similar problem where a deleted files where still keep open by a daemon process: this led to df - du to disagree... But I've not enough info to say it's the same problem ... Kind regards, Roberto e-mail roberto.trovo [at] redix.it |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Bug 395] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible, bugzilla-daemon |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Bug 395] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible, bugzilla-daemon |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: du vs. df inconsistency, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: du vs. df inconsistency, Robert Brockway |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |